← All news

Policy

Torvalds backs AI-tool use in Linux mailing-list dispute

According to two contemporaneous reports, Linus Torvalds said Linux was not an anti-AI project during a July 16 mailing-list dispute over objections to other developers using AI tools. He called AI useful and said those objectors could fork the project or leave.

correctedUpdated Jul 22, 2026, 1:19 AM UTC
Original source

Linux kernel project

Read the original source

What happened

The original mailing-list post was not directly verified, so the event rests on matching reports from TechSpot and Tom's Hardware. Neither report establishes that Torvalds issued a new formal contribution policy.

Linux's existing AI guidance predates the exchange. It keeps code review, licensing checks, Developer Certificate of Origin sign-off, and responsibility with human contributors. It also bars AI agents from adding Signed-off-by tags.

The guidance says AI-assisted contributions should include an Assisted-by disclosure tag. It does not call that tag mandatory.

Why it matters

The dispute distinguishes permission to use coding assistants from delegation of accountability. In a project whose code is widely reused, the written rules keep review, licensing checks, and formal sign-off with a human contributor.

What remains unclear

Related claims

Sources

  1. AI Coding Assistants — The Linux Kernel documentationPrimary source - Linux kernel project - official-documentation - Apr 12, 2026

    Used for: Existing requirements for AI-assisted kernel contributions.

    Open source

  2. Linus Torvalds tells AI critics to fork Linux or walk awayTechSpot - independent-news - Jul 16, 2026

    Used for: Reported July 16 mailing-list comments.

    Open source

  3. Linus Torvalds rebukes anti-AI stances in the Linux kernel code review process, says 'Linux is not one of those anti-AI projects' — creator embraces AI as just a tool and 'clearly a useful one'Tom's Hardware - independent-news - Jul 16, 2026

    Used for: Independent corroboration of the reported comments.

    Open source