Claim library

Browse claims.

Short pages for repeated AI complaints. Each one should include concrete sources, comparison baselines when useful, and a clear verdict.

EnvironmentSourcedClaim misleading

Is AI bad for the environment?

Data center growth deserves real numbers, not planet-doom slogans.

ClaimEvidenceVerdict
EnvironmentSourcedClaim misleading

Does AI use too much water?

Water claims need location, cooling method, and data-center baselines.

ClaimEvidenceVerdict
ArtSourcedClaim unproven

Does AI steal art?

Training, copying, style imitation, copyright, and compensation are different claims.

ClaimEvidenceVerdict
CopyrightSourcedClaim rejected

Is AI just plagiarism?

Plagiarism, infringement, memorization, and style imitation are not the same thing.

ClaimEvidenceVerdict
EducationSourcedClaim misleading

Does AI make students stupid?

Tool misuse is real, but cheating and learning support are different claims.

ClaimEvidenceVerdict
HallucinationsSourcedClaim misleading

Do hallucinations make AI useless?

Errors matter, but usefulness depends on task, verification, and failure cost.

ClaimEvidenceVerdict
TechnologySourcedClaim rejected

Is AI just autocomplete?

Next-token prediction is real, but the dismissal skips measured capability.

ClaimEvidenceVerdict
BiasSourcedClaim misleading

Is AI uniquely biased?

Bias is real, but comparisons should include human and institutional baselines.

ClaimEvidenceVerdict
CultureSourcedClaim misleading

Does AI kill creativity?

Creative tools can flatten output or expand iteration depending on use.

ClaimEvidenceVerdict